Workers as Company Assets - Set 2

Company Decisions Regarding Preexisting Conditions

 

Context:

Part of the medical department’s job was to examine employees for preexisting conditions that might cost the company money in healthcare or lawsuits.

When reading these letters, think about the different relationships the doctor and the manager had with workers. What arguments did Dr. Simonson bring up, and what did MacNaughton focus on in his response?

 

Albert Lantto’s Medical Screening Letter

 
A historic document from the MTU Archives.

A. B. Simonson to James MacNaughton, May 7, 1914, Calumet and Hecla Mining Companies Collection, MS-002, box 47, folder 520, Michigan Tech Archives & Copper Country Historical Collections, Houghton, MI.

 

 

Reply to Albert Lantto’s Medical Screening Letter

 
2nd V.P. and Gen.Mgr. To A. B. Simonson, May 8, 1914, Calumet and Hecla Mining Companies Collection, MS-002, box 47, folder 520, Michigan Tech Archives & Copper Country Historical Collections, Houghton, MI.

James MacNaughton To A. B. Simonson, June 1, 1914, Calumet and Hecla Mining Companies Collection, MS-002, box 47, folder 520, Michigan Tech Archives & Copper Country Historical Collections, Houghton, MI.

 

 

Stop and Reflect:

Think about the different relationships the doctor and the manager had with workers.

  • What arguments did Dr. Simonson bring up, and what did MacNaughton focus on in his response?

 

Historian's Perspective:

This builds on our understanding of company structure.

Doctors had direct working relationships with employees. Dr. Simonson described Albert Lantto’s health and record here, but he also commented on Lantto as “strong and able” and described the family’s situation. He accounted for both medicine and personal knowledge when he recommended Albert for underground work.

Managers were different. This is not to say that MacNaughton didn’t care, but his position in the company made it easier to step back and see workers as numbers on paper. His line about “obligation” makes it clear that his concern was not whether Lantto could physically do the job but whether the company had to help him. Lantto quit willingly, so Calumet and Hecla was not responsible for what happened to him afterwards. To the company, there was no benefit in hiring a worker who might be slower or less efficient.
 

Set 3

Proceed to the next set of documents in the Workers as Company Assets group.

Workers as Company Assets - Set 3
 

Last updated: March 31, 2025

Park footer

Contact Info

Mailing Address:

25970 Red Jacket Road
Calumet, MI 49913

Phone:

906 337-3168

Contact Us