Workers' Comp?Context:For years, workers injured on the job had limited ways to make employers pay compensation. Many industries felt they were not morally—or more important, legally—responsible for accidents they did not actively cause even if they knew the job was dangerous. During the early 1900s, the general public began to feel companies should be more liable, and states across the nation began passing Worker Compensation laws. Benjamin Guy Threatens to Sue![]() Benjamin Guy To Frederick Denton, June 29, 1911, Copper Range Company Records, MS-080, box 297, folder 5, Michigan Tech Archives & Copper Country Historical Collections, Houghton, MI. 205 South Curry St
Ironwood, Gogebic Co. Mich Mr. Denton, Dear Sir Just a few lines concerning my eye which I lost in Trimountain Mine under Capt Bowden. I should not have left from that place if I was treated right. I think he treated me far from right when I was able to go to work, he put me down traming so could not get along, so had to quit & go & now I can not get my living at mining, so I have to get the best way that I can, so am sending this to see if you will do something for me, for I do not want to sue the company if I can help it, but the[y] are trying to persuade to do so & then the lawyers get the benefit if I do. From yours truly, Benj Guy [different handwritting beneath the letter] Lost eye while waiting to start a hole – June 29 1911-Nov 1st Club paid him 150.00 Company Response to Guy's Letter![]() Frederick Denton To Benjamin Guy, February 5, 1913, Copper Range Company Records, MS-080, box 297, folder 5, Michigan Tech Archives & Copper Country Historical Collections, Houghton, MI. Feb. 5, 1913.
Mr. Benjamin Guy, 205 South Curry St., Ironwood, Mich. Dear Sir: I acknowledge receipt of your letter. After investigating your case I do not find that you were treated unfairly but were given the same consideration as is the custom of the Company in the cases of men injured by accident as you were. The injury that resulted in the loss of your eye was not received in a manner which in any way makes the Company liable to you. Having left our employ entirely of your own accord I cannot now offer you any further assistance. Yours very truly, [Signature of Frederick Denton] General Manager. FWD/R Stop and Reflect:What do these letters reveal?
Historian's Perspective:When researching events where one group had more power than others, historians look for autonomy, or the ability of all groups to act even when limited. Companies had more money and legal influence, but saying workers were helplessly pushed around ignores parts of the story.In this case, Benjamin Guy used what leverage he had: the threat of legal action. He said he was already speaking with lawyers, removing responsibility from himself by implying they were the ones who wanted to sue. It was best for everyone if the company decided to “do something” for him of their own free will, although it’s unclear from this letter alone what exactly he wanted in compensation. Denton’s reply displays the power difference between employees and employers. He was not concerned about being sued. At least, that’s what he wanted Guy to think. Worker Compensation laws did help employees get paid, but by outlining what workers could sue companies for, they also ended up laying out what workers could not sue for. Guy claimed he had been forced to quit at Copper Range and could not get another job due to the injury, but if the company hadn’t technically broken any laws or had control of all the records, a lawsuit could be difficult. Documents like these push researchers to dig deeper. To find records surrounding Guy’s injury, such as accident reports, or to find out if he actually sued, it is best to start by asking the archivist. They know if their collections hold those documents and can tell you where to look next. More Documents to Explore
|
Last updated: March 31, 2025